In a provocative turn of events, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump shared a video on his Social Truth platform that has sparked international controversy. The video, featuring renowned economist Professor Jeffrey Sachs, includes explicit criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The post has intensified debates about Netanyahu's role in Middle Eastern conflicts, with Trump's endorsement of the video drawing widespread attention.

In a provocative turn of events, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump shared a video on his Social Truth platform that has sparked international controversy. The video, featuring renowned economist Professor Jeffrey Sachs, includes explicit criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The post has intensified debates about Netanyahu's role in Middle Eastern conflicts, with Trump’s endorsement of the video drawing widespread attention.

Netanyahu Accused of Instigating Conflicts

The video highlights Sachs' critique of Netanyahu's influence on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the Middle East. Sachs accuses Netanyahu of perpetuating a narrative that suggests overthrowing governments supporting groups like Hamas and Hezbollah is the only solution to regional instability. He specifically names Iraq, Syria, and Iran as targets of these policies, framing Netanyahu as a central figure in escalating tensions.

Explicit Language Draws Backlash

The controversy deepened when the video included a statement labeling Netanyahu a "dark and twisted son of a...," a phrase that has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters. While Trump himself did not directly make this statement, his decision to share the video has been interpreted as tacit approval of its content.

Potential Diplomatic Fallout

Trump’s post could have significant diplomatic repercussions, reigniting tensions between him and Netanyahu. This is not the first time the two leaders have clashed publicly, but the explicit nature of this post marks a new low in their strained relationship.

As Trump prepares to assume office, this incident raises questions about the direction of U.S. policy in the Middle East under his leadership. The controversial nature of the post and the explicit language used have amplified global scrutiny, making it a defining moment in the evolving dynamics between the U.S. and Israel.